Beyond False Choices: The Full Gospel Baptist Church Fellowship and Black Baptist Identities

 

fgbc

This week approximately 30,000 Baptists are in Atlanta for the 21st Annual Full Gospel Baptist Church Fellowship (FGBCF) Conference. Founded in 1994 to give black Baptists “the right to choose” charismatic gifts, ordained women clergy, and episcopal leadership innovations, the FGBCF is a growing fellowship of 2,500 churches who seek to maintain a broadly Baptist identity while also augmenting traditional views on the Holy Spirit and ministry. Many of the pastors who now belong to Full Gospel are also aligned with the National Baptist Convention USA, from which Bishop Paul Morton emerged two decades ago to found this movement. Though controversial from its inception, FGBCF seems to continue to make an impact in the black church world, both nationally and globally. And with the ascension of Bishop Joseph W. Walker III to the international presiding bishop role, there has been much chatter about Full Gospel’s exponential outreach to younger Baptists in the years to come.

As a mainstay on the ecclesial landscape, FGBCF has produced both condemnation and celebration. Traditionalist Baptists do not consider Full Gospel Baptists as Baptists at all, averring that the movement is erroneous both doctrinally and polity wise. The major consternation the Traditionalists have is around the appropriation of episcopal government, since historically Baptists of all kinds have repudiated monarchial bishops as being non-biblical. Many others have also objected to the embrace of charismatic gifts, maintaining a cessationist pneumatology. To these Traditionalists, FGBCF is a bastardized Church of God in Christ, and not Baptist in the least.

Others, and I’ll call them Generous Baptists, celebrate FGBCF even if they are unwilling to formally join it. These Generous Baptists tend to see Baptist life and witness as more historically varied and complex than what the Traditionalists would allow. They may have concerns about Baptist bishops, but don’t see much harm in the trend because most FGBCF churches still maintain local autonomy, an essential doctrine for classical Baptists. Also Generous Baptists see the cessationist argument as deeply flawed and are either cautiously continualists (believing all spiritual gifts are for the Church today but must be used in the strictest obedience to Pauline restrictions) or full-blown charismatics.

Admittedly (and without apology) I am in the latter group. Though I have some criticisms of Full Gospel, I do think the movement has helped some Baptists interrogate the dimensions and depths of historical and contemporary Baptist life. There is a growing number of saints who embrace the neologism “Bapticostal” to self-identify for this very reason. To be sure, Baptist pastor HB Charles is right when he argues that at some point there are points of departure for Baptists and Pentecostals on a number of finer doctrinal differences. For instance, most Baptists will never embrace speaking in tongues as a necessary sign of salvation, or that all truly saved and Spirit-filled saints must speak in tongues. But those distinctions aside, I believe that contemporary, younger Baptists are wrestling with received traditions about spiritual gifts in general. This is not true for all younger Baptists; many are actually embracing conservative Reformed traditions, which actually brings about another controversy. In some sense, the term Bapticostal is employed by many simply because we have too often defined Baptist doctrine in ways that excludes certain elements of pneumatology recognizable in Pentecostals circles. This need not be the term to define Baptists who are also open to the Holy Spirit’s full array of gifts. John Piper is a Reformed Baptist who embraces the charismata, and I seriously doubt he would ever say that he is a Baptiscostal. But from where I sit, the Generous Baptist paradigm is becoming more influential, whether by the Bapticostal name or by another.

I have taught a number of times in the General Missionary Baptist State Convention of Mississippi and have discovered that a host of Missionary Baptists here are secretly continualists or charismatics. This could be due to FBGCF or the saturation of religious broadcasting and Gospel music with neo-Pentecostal sensibilities. In many cases, however, I have heard from Missionary Baptists whose plain reading of the Bible led them to embrace all spiritual gifts as a doctrinal option, or they have witnessed or experienced these gifts themselves. They share this in private conversations, not wanting to be shunned by the Traditionalists among them.

For those of us who believe in the perpetuity of spiritual gifts, then, FGBCF has opened up a much needed conversation among Baptist parishioners. In a recent radio interview, I asked a young preacher why he embraces the term Bapticostal as a moniker. He said that there are things that he loves and learned from both Baptists and Pentecostals and refuses to make a false choice. I, too, have the same testimony. Growing up Baptist, and experiencing God in a powerful away in the Pentecostal world, I’ve come to appreciate both streams in my life, and do not feel any hesitation of owning up to that. And though I am not a member of the FGBCF, I believe that their emergence has positively impacted the way many Baptists understand themselves in the 21st century. One can only speculate what impact it will have 20 years from now.

onae

O’nae Chatman and me during Sunday’s interview.

With or without FGBCF, there are many Baptists today who are much more open to the surprising movements of the Holy Spirit and seek to glorify Jesus and share His Gospel in all the Spirit’s fullness. May it be so.

Advertisements
Standard

11 thoughts on “Beyond False Choices: The Full Gospel Baptist Church Fellowship and Black Baptist Identities

  1. Millus Bass says:

    Keen eye, brother Rhodes… Keen eye…

    WordPress.com

    CJ Rhodes, MDiv posted: ”

    This week approximately 30,000 Baptists are in Atlanta for the 21st Annual Full Gospel Baptist Church Fellowship (FGBCF) Conference. Founded in 1994 to give black Baptists “the right to choose” charismatic gifts, ordained women clergy, and e”

  2. Wesley E. Bridges says:

    Well said. I, although grew up baptist, do agree that FGBC has impacted the way I once viewed the Holy Ghost. I’ve embraced both sides, both monikers if you will. It brought together “fire and ice”. COGIC was dubbed by some to be all fire and no ice. Baptist was dubbed by some to be all ice and no fire. I love the combination! Thx Pastor Rhodes!

  3. 30,000 Baptist and 2,500 churches? I don’t believe that those numbers are accurate sir. I attended Full Gospel Fellowship last year and I don’t believe that there were more than three thousand persons in attendance the Thursday night when Bishop Morton gave his message. And how could you bypass the split that occurred over the election and Neil Ellis’s departure and the birth of another movement that convenes next week in Winston Salem North Carolina.
    I do agree that the Full Gospel Baptist movement was a move of God that brought freedom to many Baptists who embrace the fullness of Holy Spirit. Unfortunately a move of a God becomes a monument when men take over what God has initiated.

    • CJ Rhodes, MDiv says:

      Thanks for your comment, Bernard. I got those numbers, true or exaggerated though they may be, from FGBCF’s website. Are you a member of Full Gospel or GUF?

  4. No I’m not a member of either. I’m attending GUF tomorrow. I’m an observer of this movement. May write a book on the impact both has and will have on the church and why Ellis left.

  5. Min. Robbie Robinson says:

    Absolutely love the post. What I’m finding is that more and more people are not only taking note of FGBCF, but exactly don’t know how to approach it. To the traditional Baptists, Bishop Morton is about as much an upstart as was the Rev. Clay Evans was 50 years ago. To the Pentecostals, i.e COGIC, PAW, COOLJC, PCJC, etc., he’s a “frienemy.” To the “Bapticostals”, this is what they’ve desired for years. Growing up in a traditional Baptist Church, FGBCF were considered “undesirable.” Now, FGBCF is welcomed, and even adored. I can honestly say in my life that FGBCF, while having some issues, is something I can relate to, and I have considered, on many occasions, joining them (and yes, I am a young licensed minister.) I am curious, however, as to what made you decide to write about FGBCF, and do you think other denominations and reformations are taking notes or even adopting policies from FGBCF? Be blessed, my brother.

    • CJ Rhodes, MDiv says:

      Thanks for commenting, Min. Robinson. I appreciate your insights. I picked FGBCF because it serves as a conversation partner with traditional Baptist churches. Some have considered it COGIC 2.0 and others say it’s more Pentecostal than Baptist. I am grateful that it is causing those in traditional Baptist contexts to look again at doctrines of the Holy Spirit to see whether or not they are truly cessationists. More and more Baptists are friendly to and receptive of the gifts, and I think in that way FGBCF has been beneficial in the ecumenical dialog about the Holy Spirit and the Lord’s Church.

  6. Min. Robbie Robinson says:

    Thank you for the reply, Brother Rhodes. I do have a two-part question. 1) Do you think FGBCF has influenced other denominations that at one point was considered “traditional?” by their policies and spiritual lifestyle? (e.g. AME, AMEZ, CME, UMC, SDA, etc.) 2) As I am teaching a class on Baptist history to my church (as many call themselves “Baptist” but are in-cognizant of what it means to be Baptist), what literature would you recommend to use to teach about the history of the Baptist faith, with an African-American background?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s